Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42CDD10A6F for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51905 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2013 21:15:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 51861 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2013 21:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 51853 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2013 21:15:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:15:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shadowsor@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.54] (HELO mail-vb0-f54.google.com) (209.85.212.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:15:27 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q14so1562113vbe.41 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kJhNtLQcwbK17JUGodRlisTkMJ6zPZBA6Ds+M1lG+Cw=; b=EiqymVWy9UWaeQm3T2fUwKsEJ6YIKYEHuYVrHhvCGep3YL6fn7cBZ+Mn4QkwF8/2Dp /iaxvKMu8pvPYAc/1XGpA7GhYY4HCD5ycutLgjS2Ex4Z01dZcQRzY/GoA5rwKRnlRJqc i8ro14O+mC6Xvi3nv/Yq+MpB5oO6cpBdFglePrRURwtbBD8KOkeVpIt3pVKx0PI44kKu E7Jhowjhla9lOIinNfd0+EgGMFeaUJenuKh+l3p6J89xV9GFthOucMXY75u4jOi0vI4S ozOxODIL2SrQAvD59jNWnoukGN+MDIPBXZo3wwZkWxKSwxW4FFrknXpAzB8ndigWo0+W Wy+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.140.69 with SMTP id h5mr4692151vcu.0.1378415707067; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.165.6 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:15:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD870D3DCA@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net> References: <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD870D3DCA@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:15:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Questions about 4.2 RC From: Marcus Sorensen To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org More questions... I've been going down the rabbithole in figuring out how to deploy VPCs. Part of this might be a missing marvin config in my zone deploy, I still have no idea yet, but after reviewing https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/internal-load-balancing-between-vpc-tiers.html, I found that I have to do this: > list internalloadbalancerelements > configure internalloadbalancerelement enabled=true id=de5f3495-6a48-4451-bd2f-e9cb9a7f6fbf Now I can go into the UI and enable the InternalLbVM provider, and finally create a VPC. Is this how we expect users to do it, or is there something I'm missing in the UI. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sebgoa [mailto:runseb@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:22 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi >> Subject: Questions about 4.2 RC >> >> Hi, >> >> I followed the testing procedure for the 4.2 RC, I am ready to vote +1 but I >> have questions (hence the new thread, don't want to hijack the VOTE). >> >> 1. the CHANGES file points to the release notes, but where are the release >> notes ? I know that no-one really stepped up on the RN but can't we at a >> minimum do a JIRA query that lists the bugs fixed in 4.2 and the new >> features ? >> >> 2. Under infrastructure when I view the DevCloud Zone, I get this in the log: >> WARN [cloud.api.ApiServer] (642225853@qtp-111037821-10:) Unknown API >> command: listVmwareDcs This is not a deal breaker but why is our UI calling a >> non-implemented API ? This sounds like introducing known issues. If it's not >> implemented yet, remove it. > > The command is only available in non-oss build, but is still listed in command.properties, as there is no separate file for commands non-oss build. > >> >> 3. Under instances, the new tooltip shows a 'vm snapshot' icon. When you >> use it, it snapshots but the snapshot is not shown under storage>view >> snapshots ? Instead you see the snapshot under the instance view. >> Proceeding to destroy the instance will destroy the snapshot, or at a >> minimum we don't have access to it via the UI. It seems to be the difference >> between listVMSnapshot and listSnapshots. > > It's by design, the vm snapshot is listed under vm->vm snapshot view, while the volume snapshot listed under storage->snapshot view. > >> >> >> -Sebastien