cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Girish Shilamkar <gir...@clogeny.com>
Subject Re: Virtual router and vm on different hosts
Date Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:57:15 GMT
Hello Marty, Marcus,

Thanks for the explanation, I have updated the test accordingly.

Regards,
Girish

On 14-Sep-2013, at 9:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, as Marty mentions they can be on any host, with tagged vlans linking
> everything together.If you prefer them on the same host you can write a
> custom allocator. The user concentrated algorithm packs VMS together when
> possible, and random allocator is self explanatory, but I don't think
> either pay attention to the router/guest relationships.
> On Sep 14, 2013 1:22 AM, "Girish Shilamkar" <girish@clogeny.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I was under the assumption that virtual router (VR) and vm spawned for an
>> account would always be on the same host. Therefore in
>> egress rule automation tests we were ssh'ing VR via host on which the vm
>> was created. But recently we saw failures in egress rule tests
>> as VR was not reachable from host on which vm was created. While debugging
>> this issue I found that VR and vm for an account can be on different host.
>> It would be great if someone could confirm this.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Girish
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message