cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
Date Sun, 08 Sep 2013 06:40:30 GMT
-1 ... sorry guys, especially with Simon chiming in.

I'd request f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9 be cherry-picked.

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> followed the testing procedure
>
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Animesh
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2013, at 1:55 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:18:35PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:21 AM
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
>>>>>
>>>>> Animesh,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd ask that this vote stay open until EOD Monday.  I've tested the
>>>>> basic sig / artifact, but I want an opportunity to run it in an actual
>>>>> environment before formally voting.
>>>> [Animesh>] Sure I can keep  the VOTE open until Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, there is an issue being raised by Marcus (that Edison was going
to
>>>>> look into) in another thread around the CPVM.  Is this a blocker issue?
>>>> [Animesh>]Edison is working on a fix and will put in 4.2-forward branch.
I am not sure who else uses CLVM to access the broader impact, if it is Marcus and he is fine
with using Edison's fix in his environment than not an issue.
>>>
>>> Ha...  I thought it was around the cPvm, not cLvm.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I guess it's up to Marcus (and others) to vote accordingly WRT
>>> there concern about this issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks for holding off until EOD Monday for me (and perhaps others) to
>>> vote!
>>>
>>> -chip
>>
>> Of course more testing and feedback of RC is better
>

Mime
View raw message