cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edison Su <Edison...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
Date Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:45:08 GMT
In order to support it, I need to manually, find a way to install CLVM(find an ISCSI disk,
create CLVM on it etc) in my Lab,  a lot of work to do.
Is it possible, I write some code, then have you help to test? I almost finished the code.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadowsor@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:32 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
> 
> I don't use CLVM any more, and I have no idea how many people do. I'm
> relatively certain that some do, because of past questions/bug reports.
> Regardless, I don't think it should be decided based on someone's guess at
> how many people it will impact, but instead on whether we are willing to ship
> regressions for the sake of a time based release. If we had some hard data it
> could be useful, but since we don't I think we have to assume the worst.
> On Sep 6, 2013 2:55 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:18:35PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:21 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
> > > >
> > > > Animesh,
> > > >
> > > > I'd ask that this vote stay open until EOD Monday.  I've tested
> > > > the basic sig / artifact, but I want an opportunity to run it in
> > > > an actual environment before formally voting.
> > > [Animesh>] Sure I can keep  the VOTE open until Monday.
> > > >
> > > > Also, there is an issue being raised by Marcus (that Edison was
> > > > going
> > to
> > > > look into) in another thread around the CPVM.  Is this a blocker issue?
> > > [Animesh>]Edison is working on a fix and will put in 4.2-forward branch.
> > I am not sure who else uses CLVM to access the broader impact, if it
> > is Marcus and he is fine with using Edison's fix in his environment
> > than not an issue.
> >
> > Ha...  I thought it was around the cPvm, not cLvm.
> >
> > Anyway, I guess it's up to Marcus (and others) to vote accordingly WRT
> > there concern about this issue.
> >
> > Thanks for holding off until EOD Monday for me (and perhaps others) to
> > vote!
> >
> > -chip
> >

Mime
View raw message