cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
Date Sat, 07 Sep 2013 07:47:18 GMT
+1 (binding)

followed the testing procedure

On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Thanks
> Animesh
> 
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 1:55 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:18:35PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:21 AM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
>>>> 
>>>> Animesh,
>>>> 
>>>> I'd ask that this vote stay open until EOD Monday.  I've tested the
>>>> basic sig / artifact, but I want an opportunity to run it in an actual
>>>> environment before formally voting.
>>> [Animesh>] Sure I can keep  the VOTE open until Monday.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, there is an issue being raised by Marcus (that Edison was going to
>>>> look into) in another thread around the CPVM.  Is this a blocker issue?
>>> [Animesh>]Edison is working on a fix and will put in 4.2-forward branch. I
am not sure who else uses CLVM to access the broader impact, if it is Marcus and he is fine
with using Edison's fix in his environment than not an issue.  
>> 
>> Ha...  I thought it was around the cPvm, not cLvm.
>> 
>> Anyway, I guess it's up to Marcus (and others) to vote accordingly WRT
>> there concern about this issue.
>> 
>> Thanks for holding off until EOD Monday for me (and perhaps others) to
>> vote!
>> 
>> -chip
> 
> Of course more testing and feedback of RC is better


Mime
View raw message