Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC868101D9 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43115 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 19:54:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 43061 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 19:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 43046 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2013 19:54:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:54:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.63 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.63] (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:54:02 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,841,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="40635760" Received: from sjcpex01cl01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.143]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Aug 2013 19:53:31 +0000 Received: from SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([169.254.2.14]) by SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.143]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.004; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:53:13 -0700 From: Chiradeep Vittal To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack? Thread-Topic: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack? Thread-Index: AQHOlEdXlBSJavdYJEOHTury7RaXeZmL7hMA///LSQA= Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 19:53:13 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515 x-originating-ip: [10.216.48.12] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the price point of vShield perhaps is the sticking point? Any other alternatives to vShield? I've heard of Juniper vGW and Cisco VSG..but I guess they're all pricey. On 8/8/13 9:02 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >I don't believe anyone has requested this - consider filing enhancement >request. > >Regards >ilya > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jijun [mailto:jijunlx@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:55 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack? >>=20 >> hi, >>=20 >> is there any plan to integrate VMware vShield as Security Group in >> Cloudstack? >> or any suggestion to develop this feature to work with Cloudstack? >>=20 >> any suggestion will be appreciated!thanks. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Thanks, >> Jijun >>=20 > >