Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shadowsor@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130807200421.GL76524@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
References: <CE26AD21.23877%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
	<CALFpzo5nT8Uozz4cYV0xwP0jLQvy2B8gkxwxjTbPOG0Pd4_8hA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALFpzo6OuVqPR-oAzgtyn9dAYt7-TkO_u-rdoHaEOhqaSre5HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALFpzo5OHB2VKn6PfBiLOyOpHJVMYeppq35fO-6Qh7ri+6fe8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL8N3y1-RvyMsoSp8R7bpb=A5Oc-QhJdsPFZMsEDYPghoHhnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130807073402.GA8786@cloud-2.local>
	<CAHL8N3wXB0tCRyQ-KvqWu9ta6w1UAA-xJC5K5YbRqnHMFwjrdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2AC317E9E0682749A5A8A3C9939AE00306479263@SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
	<CA+D7hpg7+-GMPRo3kDL7MtaziQeF3z_iEoBN3KDSKntkmwhuuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALFpzo4kBchHuX8SFe1wCTEw0cCmCb1NR-irH+QV2NWodNGhyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130807200421.GL76524@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:09:58 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CALFpzo4AOg2gdswVDK0VbcBMq9Ttpz-JFXFuZ_J8BnNgi5RDOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@gmail.com>
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No idea, it's been mostly off of my radar. I just happened to try to
test a few fixes and 4.2 was having problems with local storage.  At
the least I'd say it's not a good idea for someone to use it (or any
non-production version) right now if they're setting up cloudstack for
the first time.

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not
>> sure if that is related.
>
> The master / 4.2 quality seems to be churning a ton...  this isn't a
> good sign IMO.  Did we cram in too much at the end again?