Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEEF8102EF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9636 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2013 21:00:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 9582 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2013 21:00:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 9574 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2013 21:00:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:00:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.46] (HELO mail-oa0-f46.google.com) (209.85.219.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:00:20 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l10so5465026oag.33 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1igWRV4NIK1QZb2xgJJsbLS5Kmd9JGVfcD7v/f5kroY=; b=Kcva5n4fak6ZM8duPqCIH0komNk4eju1YFDNwZ1mWC4YYINjcb0IFfIVBUHhsU3R9s t9rzK7gYYPY406Z1RRtVI3BA2lgKbEGpDNZLrEi2DJth+Db2TKlY9l72WmmIFLBLaXwc 7INOFWyNdUxsBtq4teoMxbxcp4XifVRNlCcYfzB8i5D7B8Dj/xBqwUtDokFZFLb4iTPy GWmsrmcGfWd5vjy3kBO5VRzFGU6ftFhVD28BD0mbTl2DJvHMLkGBOmDwWGzhn03VQTL7 1mDmTAQUCYOgW8F5Nl+NXdPePEIfpQpemLJBGTTldvmg4A9BcbVPGOOVMmtyR1QSG16E 7Bqw== X-Received: by 10.43.141.206 with SMTP id jf14mr330886icc.8.1375390799649; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:59:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.252.226 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:59:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20CF38CB4385CE4D9D1558D52A0FC05809B4A6@SJCPEX01CL03.citrite.net> References: <20130514144130.GB24552@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <90f53552ec94e561cd673cd8161b070e@li.nux.ro> <20CF38CB4385CE4D9D1558D52A0FC05809B4A6@SJCPEX01CL03.citrite.net> From: Daan Hoogland Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 22:59:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org :} it is due to master moving faster then me being all over the code. I have ported it once again to master and am busy testing again. but we need it and have just moved to 4.1.1. I agree with you Alex. So we will not release our fork just the patch via the earliest main release. (I could publish a 4.1.1 patch however) On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > +1 > > If it's due to company specific issues (licensing or company secret). Maybe we can propose a plugin interface for it and see if you can keep just that code private. > > Just look at how much master have changed from 4.2. If we can we should try not to fork on the core code in cloudstack. Maintaining will be tough. > > --Alex > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net] >> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:51 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? >> >> Daan and Hugo, >> >> This is just my opinion, you should consider merging this feature into master >> when time allows - this way you don't have to maintain a private branch of >> ACS in the future. Just my two cents :) >> >> Regards >> ilya >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:13 AM >> > To: dev >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Musayev, Ilya >> > wrote: >> > > The reason why CloudSand was created, was to bring in urgently >> > > needed >> > features into stable version, such that on the next major upgrade to >> > ACS, all features work as expected and nothing should break. >> > This is the same that we have done. Except that we have put work into >> > CLOUDSTACK-1532 that was urgently needed internally at Schuberg >> > Philis. It is implemented in 4.1.1-SBP a private release. I have >> > ported it to master several times but testing and paralel development >> > on other network features have prevented it from being merged in master. >> > >> > > What features are we talking about? >> > >> > I gues our focus is hastening our own development and not backporting. >> > >> > regards, >> > Daan >> >