cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?
Date Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:59:39 GMT
:} it is due to master moving faster then me being all over the code.
I have ported it once again to master and am busy testing again. but
we need it and have just moved to 4.1.1. I agree with you Alex. So we
will not release our fork just the patch via the earliest main
release. (I could publish a 4.1.1 patch however)

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Alex Huang <Alex.Huang@citrix.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> If it's due to company specific issues (licensing or company secret).  Maybe we can propose
a plugin interface for it and see if you can keep just that code private.
>
> Just look at how much master have changed from 4.2.  If we can we should try not to fork
on the core code in cloudstack.  Maintaining will be tough.
>
> --Alex
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:51 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?
>>
>> Daan and Hugo,
>>
>> This is just my opinion, you should consider merging this feature into master
>> when time allows - this way you don't have to maintain a private branch of
>> ACS in the future. Just my two cents :)
>>
>> Regards
>> ilya
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:13 AM
>> > To: dev
>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Musayev, Ilya <imusayev@webmd.net>
>> > wrote:
>> > > The reason why CloudSand was created, was to bring in urgently
>> > > needed
>> > features into stable version, such that on the next major upgrade to
>> > ACS, all features work as expected and nothing should break.
>> > This is the same that we have done. Except that we have put work into
>> > CLOUDSTACK-1532 that was urgently needed internally at Schuberg
>> > Philis. It is implemented in 4.1.1-SBP a private release. I have
>> > ported it to master several times but testing and paralel development
>> > on other network features have prevented it from being merged in master.
>> >
>> > > What features are we talking about?
>> >
>> > I gues our focus is hastening our own development and not backporting.
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Daan
>>
>

Mime
View raw message