cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
Date Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:43:00 GMT


> On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
> > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 79
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line79>
> >
> >     I don't quite understand this part. Why "//" is missing in this case? Who would
require "//" and who wouldn't?

Only the mido code needs the explicit // the rest can deal with URI constructors


- daan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24756
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:38 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 8:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng
Yang.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 
>   api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> daan Hoogland
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message