Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-39337-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C691310E80
	for <apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:29:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 1007 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2013 11:29:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 969 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2013 11:29:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cloudstack.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 956 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2013 11:29:55 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:29:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com)
 (209.85.214.177)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:29:50 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f8so754669obp.22
        for <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=/HBvIyOwfKF7TTJtG7sKelsMTpqGUA1eQrQZ8zLgRAo=;
        b=tANnDUsAd9wmZJF5Zokx9Rav4fLIy/97X2GWWGsnpLxNWX7jfzwNQjKphYS8xKkifY
         2hXZwWKqqSlS7hsPXFYtQGGyK4g/LX1EInxbg2idZil6x9zG+18VjsByIlx6hxaCLns+
         WfRCDqExXjDJmFJIfjf2S+tD1rZzEuHrkblVQFdViaNYeXdzyOSWkH9/hx1nUyg7Kuy/
         nDejBZimJh13kz6KQcbBq/vJF8aftNyMZ9+I165D0JG4X4R67dufEQbVFACoemnJExph
         Qk1KBNEEB2bCe1Ps6M8yrCtK5XdwMLfiQo/mtINLNmQ4Pu9Vb8/ug+5GXV5iv7V76Fl1
         R6vA==
X-Received: by 10.43.138.66 with SMTP id ir2mr20601268icc.40.1374924569015;
 Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.252.226 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 04:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEJ3w4V2j_3PLgDMAM9DxnbFOnAbza5E30b_oTi-SGxzqUv0dw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGQtxvaakkYdewfUs-DdCKg8O2EGvzA_q3L8EOa95ojVLDhKtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEJ3w4V2j_3PLgDMAM9DxnbFOnAbza5E30b_oTi-SGxzqUv0dw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:29:08 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQtxvairPkhfOGwzDeZsj_-hYgUVW1ynCh9pVHJsNpA35kt7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rejected mail by dev.apache.org
To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25838877a0704e27c926f
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c25838877a0704e27c926f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

thanks, i c&p'd a link from another mail, big sin of course.


On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Ian Duffy <ian@ianduffy.ie> wrote:

> Just check your not sending emails in HTML. They get rejected unless
> they are plain text :-)
>
> On 27 July 2013 12:21, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I replied to a message a minute ago and got <quote>
> > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
> >
> >      dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > Technical details of permanent failure:
> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
> for
> > the recipient domain cloudstack.apache.org by mx1.eu.apache.org.
> > [192.87.106.230].
> >
> > The error that the other server returned was:
> > 552 spam score (5.0) exceeded threshold (HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_
> > LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK
> > </quote>
> >
> > so this one is to test if it is me
>

--001a11c25838877a0704e27c926f--