cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Zhang <Frank.Zh...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:28:51 GMT
Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we need to go through 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> 
> Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file described below.
> 
> Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information required?
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >
> > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer
> > > > on the source website :
> > > > "Warning:
> > > >  not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha"
> quality!"
> > > >
> > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Amogh
> > > >
> > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Alex.Huang@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Amogh,
> > > > >
> > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > > > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.  Can you
> > > > >check on if you can use this?
> > > > >
> > > > ><dependency>
> > > > >    <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > > > >    <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > > > >    <version>0.3.11</version>
> > > > ></dependency>
> > > > >
> > > > >--Alx
> > > > >
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > > > >> httpclient/commons-
> > > > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX5
> > > > >> 09Tr
> > > > >> us
> > > > >> tM
> > > > >> anager.java
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --Alex
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar"
> > > > >> > <amogh.vasekar@citrix.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven
for
> > > > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package
in
> > > > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc
and ucs)
> > > > >> > >for easier
> > > > >>maintenance.
> > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >Thanks,
> > > > >> > >Amogh
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Frank.Zhang@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as
it has been
> > > > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance
effort.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib
jar
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found
this
> > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase :
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > > > >> > >>> k-
> > > > >> > >>> elements/c
> > > > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already
a part
> > > > >> > >>>of httpclient-contribs  jar
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > > > >> tr
> > > > >> > ib31jar.
> > > > >> > >>> htm
> > > > >> > >>> )
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason
the jar was
> > > > >> > >>>not included instead  (probably since it is
a contrib
> > > > >> > >>>jar?)
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >> > >>> Amogh
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message