cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Zhang <Frank.Zh...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:59:59 GMT
Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik.das@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> 
> For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on
> > the source website :
> > "Warning:
> >  not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
> >
> > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amogh
> >
> > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <Alex.Huang@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Amogh,
> > >
> > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to
> > >compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.  Can you check
> > >on if you can use this?
> > >
> > ><dependency>
> > >    <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> > >    <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> > >    <version>0.3.11</version>
> > ></dependency>
> > >
> > >--Alx
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> > >>
> > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> > >> httpclient/commons-
> > >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Tr
> > >> us
> > >> tM
> > >> anager.java
> > >>
> > >> --Alex
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> >
> > >> > +1
> > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <amogh.vasekar@citrix.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> > >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> > >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> > >> > >easier
> > >>maintenance.
> > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Thanks,
> > >> > >Amogh
> > >> > >
> > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Frank.Zhang@citrix.com>
wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> > >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Hi All,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this
package
> > >> > >>>in the codebase :
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> > >> > >>> k-
> > >> > >>> elements/c
> > >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part
of
> > >> > >>>httpclient-contribs  jar
> > >> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> > >> tr
> > >> > ib31jar.
> > >> > >>> htm
> > >> > >>> )
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was
not
> > >> > >>>included instead  (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > >> > >>> Amogh
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >


Mime
View raw message