cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: In-Development Release Naming
Date Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:58:04 GMT
Exactly (+1) and 'gammarays' or '#gammarays' have my preference.



On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:28 PM, John Burwell <jburwell@basho.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Since we have adopted Semantic Versioning [1], it seems odd that we
> designate a release version before the final set of enhancements/fixes has
> been identified.  For example, the release proceeding 4.2 may contain no
> backwards compatible API changes to be 4.3.  Conversely, we may decide
> during the development cycle, as a community, to accept a non-backwards
> compatible change which would bump the version to 5.0.0.  As such, it is
> difficult to know in advance what the proper semantic version number will
> be at when the work is released.  We run the risk of confusing our users if
> we start calling a pending release say 4.3.0, and accept a change mid-cycle
> that will bump it to 5.0.0.  To address this potential issue, I proposed
> that we refer to releases by a codename until feature freeze when we
> understand the complete scope of change and can apply the correct semantic
> version number.  I further propose we codename the release directly
> proceeding 4.2 "Gamma Rays" or "Gamma Rays Gonna Get Ya".
>
> Thoughts?
> -John
>
> [1]: http://semver.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message