cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
Subject Re: Is VMware working in 4.2?
Date Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:15:46 GMT
Yeah, it appears to be completely backwards.

When I go to the dashboard, it says I've got 34.05 GB used of 35 GB. In
reality 34.05 are available (per what vSphere Client says).

I can log a bug on this.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was having a hard time understanding why my VMware-only setup was
> complaining that there was little space left on my one primary storage
> until I looked in the DB.
>
> 36562796544 (below) supposedly represents the used bytes while 37580963840
> (also below) represents the capacity bytes.
>
> Used bytes was recently changed from available bytes (in late June for
> 4.2) and I wonder if this was not incorporated into the VMware logic
> because the datastore that this DB row represents claims (in vSphere
> Client) have have over 34 GB remaining.
>
> 6 172.16.140.2 Local Storage 4cccd1e4d37c3afc94381b7d3a914757 LVM 0 1 1 3
> 36562796544 37580963840 172.16.140.2 datastore-74 2013-07-16 00:37:11 Up
> DefaultPrimary HOST 0
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message