cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: Object Store Region Assignment
Date Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:34:38 GMT
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell <jburwell@basho.com> wrote:

> Chip,
>
> So two regions won't share the same database?
>

Nope, that's why you have to use something (not provided yet) to sync the
acct / domain metadata between them.


>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:46:36PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> In reviewing the 4.2 object store enhancements, object stores are
> defined with region scope.  However, there is no way to assign an object
> store definition to a region.  To my way of thinking, we must be able to
> assign an object store to a region to avoid transfer of large assets across
> WAN links.  Furthermore, it greatly reduces availability of the object
> store cluster because the management server/ssvm may attempt to connect to
> an object store over a WAN link when co-located instance is available.  Why
> isn't assignment of an object store to a region supported?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -John
> >
> > AFAIK, a management server is only a control point for a single region.
> > The Region entity is used to provide users with a reference to other
> > regions that may be part of the same service.  If I'm right, then the
> > locally configured object-store would be for that region only.
> >
> > Other feel free to correct me.
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message