cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Huang <Alex.Hu...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2013 05:25:01 GMT
Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?

http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-httpclient/commons-httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509TrustManager.java

--Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> 
> +1
> @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> 
> On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <amogh.vasekar@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for contrib-ssl,
> >the current idea is to put this package in cloud-utils (it is a
> >dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for easier maintenance.
> >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Amogh
> >
> >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <Frank.Zhang@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been proven by
> >>lots of users.
> >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vasekar@citrix.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in the
> >>>codebase :
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/network-
> >>> elements/c
> >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> >>>
> >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> >>>httpclient-contribs  jar
> >>>
> >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcontr
> ib31jar.
> >>> htm
> >>> )
> >>>
> >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not included
> >>>instead  (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Amogh
> >>
> >


Mime
View raw message