cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Bylaw changes for new committer / new PMC member votes
Date Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:32:51 GMT
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:29:07PM +0000, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> There's several places in the by laws that call for Lazy Consensus. Are we
> discussing modifying all of them or just new committer votes?

New committer and PMC membership.

sorry, I think the email could be more clear.  This is per the $subject:
new committer / new PMC member votes only.

> 
> On 7/19/13 9:02 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >As it stands now, we currently use a "Lazy Consensus" model (yes Noah, I
> >know we didn't define that term correctly as of now, but I think that's
> >a different discussion).  We currently have that term defined as:
> >
> >> Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no
> >> binding -1 votes.
> >
> >I'd like to propose that we change the PMC and committer voting rule to
> >use the Lazy 2/3 Majority approach defined as:
> >
> >> Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 binding votes and twice as
> >> many binding +1 votes as binding -1 votes.
> >
> >Are there any objections to me starting a VOTE on this change?
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message