cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template
Date Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:50:09 GMT
The jenkins build of the systemvm has been failing for a couple of days.
Can someone clean it up?

On 6/7/13 5:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:

>This is now done.
>http://s.apache.org/wy
>
>
>
>On 5/28/13 3:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well.
>>
>>On 5/28/13 3:07 PM, "Milamber" <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Chiradeep,
>>>
>>>Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0):
>>>http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2013/05/msg00050.html
>>>http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/haproxy
>>>
>>>Milamber
>>>
>>>Le 11/05/2013 01:14, Chiradeep Vittal a ecrit :
>>>> Fixed by fetching haproxy 1.4.8-1 from squeeze-backports
>>>>
>>>> On 5/9/13 4:16 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> or just use sid packages if possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Sheng
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>>>> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How old? When did it disappear?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose using the Ubuntu  package.
>>>>>> In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wget
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-
>>>>>>0
>>>>>>u
>>>>>>bu
>>>>>> nt
>>>>>> u2.1_i386.deb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also do we know if the system vm template contains the version of
>>>>>> dnsmasq
>>>>>> that is known to work for ipv6 support?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Chiradeep
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/9/13 3:48 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm
>>>>>>>for
>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>> --Sheng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>>>>>> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should we use the Ubuntu package for now?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer
is
>>>>>>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there
is no
>>>>>> schedule
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> recovering yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template
is
>>>>>>>> dangerous.
>>>>>>>>> --Sheng
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav
>>>>>>>>><bhaisaab@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
<
>>>>>>>>>> agneya2001@hotmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The haproxy and port map services are not installed
on VMWare
>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>> VM
>>>>>>>>>>> template. Is the path used to create the templates
different
>>>>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>> Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption
that the
>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>> installed on all the system VM templates meant
for different
>>>>>>>>>> hypervisors
>>>>>>>>>>> should be same ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh,
if
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>> those pkgs will be installed.
>>>>>>>>>> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee
on my
>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the
vmware-tools.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -abhi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message