cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Moving cloudmonkey to its own repository, have its own release process
Date Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:27:35 GMT
Looks good, .gitignore, Makefile, README and LICENSE were added on the new
git repo as they were needed and did not exit in tools/cli; pom.xml was
removed on the new repo as it was not needed instead we have a simple
Makefile.

Not sure about setup.py related failures.

Cheers.

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:37 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:

> So I used the diff_dirs tool and here is the output:
>
> ke4qqq@mba ~/Documents/apache/asf/committers/tools/releases[master*]$
> ./compare_dirs.pl -i
> ~/Documents/apache/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack/tools/cli/
> ~/Documents/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/
> File name comparison failed here:
> FILE/pom.xmla013255af9eb821fbdd17868b5939c3d
> FILE/.gitignore80b4d2b4ac347991c0e0cb51fb47dc40
>  Continuing...
> File name comparison failed here:
> FILE/pom.xmla013255af9eb821fbdd17868b5939c3d
> FILE/LICENSEd46978bef81ed50d0d3c0b74f2e8e0d5
>  Continuing...
> File name comparison failed here:
> FILE/pom.xmla013255af9eb821fbdd17868b5939c3d
> FILE/Makefileafc9ef31cb6d6303acf60eecbfb7d32d
>  Continuing...
> File name comparison failed here:
> FILE/pom.xmla013255af9eb821fbdd17868b5939c3d
> FILE/README.md68e19cfaa11d6b6db2e30eec117ec23f
>  Continuing...
> File name comparison failed here:
> FILE/pom.xmla013255af9eb821fbdd17868b5939c3d
> FILE/setup.py2b63d2afe3c2c9735dcc8a6ea1f9af2f
>  Continuing...
> Comparison failed here:
>
> FILE:/home/ke4qqq/Documents/apache/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack/tools/cli//setup.py:8bc9e461e46b8667274c95b9dfef1d27
>
> FILE:/home/ke4qqq/Documents/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack-cloudmonkey//setup.py:2b63d2afe3c2c9735dcc8a6ea1f9af2f
>
>
> --David
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:00 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers
> > <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> +1 - reasonable plan.  I'm not sure we need a "vote" though.  Let's
> >> use lazy consensus on this one.
> >>
> >> Folks - you can see the plan.  Shout if you disagree in any way.
> >>
> >
> > Agreed with lazy consensus for the move.
> > I would like some explicit reviews of the repo.
> > I'd really like to get this writable and a release generated.
> >
> > --David
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message