cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
Date Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:21:16 GMT
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chip Childers
<chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze
> date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus.  Well...
> we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to do.
> In out project by-laws [2], we have defined a "release plan" decision as
> follows:
>
>> 3.4.2. Release Plan
>>
>> Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also
>> nominates a Release Manager.
>>
>> A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval.
>>
>> Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur
>> on a project development mailing list.
>
> And our lazy majority is defined as:
>
>> 3.2.2. Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1
>> votes and more binding +1 votes than binding -1 votes.
>
> Our current plan is the starting point, so this VOTE is a vote to change
> the current plan.  We require a 72 hour window for this vote, so IMO we are
> in an odd position where the feature freeze date is at least extended until
> Tuesday of next week.
>
> Our current plan of record for 4.2.0 is at [3].
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/vi3nsd2yo763kzua
> [2] http://s.apache.org/csbylaws
> [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+Release
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on the following:
>
> Proposal: Extend the feature freeze date for our 4.2.0 feature release
> from today (2013-05-31) to 2013-06-28.  All other dates following the
> feature freeze date in the plan would be pushed out 4 weeks as well.
>
> Please respond with one of the following:
>
> +1 : change the plan as listed above
> +/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or -
> -1 : do not change the plan
>
> This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time.
>
> -chip


-1 (binding)

Lets stick with the current plan of record. IMO - we accepted the 4.2
timeline knowing we were late, and we could have easily adjusted it
then.

--David

Mime
View raw message