cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kishan Kavala <Kishan.Kav...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: networkACLList
Date Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:43:31 GMT
Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete NetworkACL. But these API names
are already used for rules (ACL items) within the ACL List.
This cannot be fixed without breaking backward compatibility. 
________________________________________
From: Pranav Saxena [pranav.saxena@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: networkACLList

+1  to this .

 Sounds more logical and easy to differentiate  from an end user perspective as we are actually
creating a container/group of acl rules there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:14 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: networkACLList

Isn't it redundant to call the API create/list/delete (NetworkACLList)

That expands to create/list/delete-NetworkAccessControlListList?

Should that be a Group/Container instead?

Thanks,

--
Prasanna.,

------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com


Mime
View raw message