Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED5C89629 for ; Sat, 18 May 2013 08:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14934 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2013 08:23:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 14471 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2013 08:23:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 14441 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2013 08:23:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 May 2013 08:23:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [188.40.234.195] (HELO de.nux.ro) (188.40.234.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 May 2013 08:23:06 +0000 Received: from webmail.nux.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by de.nux.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E3E19F677 for ; Sat, 18 May 2013 09:22:45 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=li.nux.ro; s=dkimnux; t=1368865365; bh=AdquoTX/TyM7SRAiXeq0b5T+JsXa3NdxBGHVVPEMZrQ=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; b=Dq2xRDPvmLNsu9Jl7yFCe74iyafdmGxVZ6b/FGzT2vpBRVePpn1qMfZ6UQo3wkTkB WZAL/bx7bGGQu9linuAM+o3L0TkY73fvzjnlh3yB8PHwgZaI+dPdvc+PWViXMF8a31 7rOZILo+cdOOkSvBCrObqgYwLA7DFvA22juYvv24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:22:45 +0100 From: Nux! To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta =?UTF-8?Q?releases=3F?= In-Reply-To: <20130514144130.GB24552@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> References: <20130514144130.GB24552@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> Message-ID: X-Sender: nux@li.nux.ro User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9-beta X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childers wrote: > As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > major feature release? Good idea! It would be great to get a feel of how things will look and work ahead of release! This could also allow people who want to do production deployments match their efforts with your development cycle (if said betas will be upgradable to release). Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro