Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BCC29122 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 23:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18375 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2013 23:38:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 18336 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2013 23:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 18282 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2013 23:38:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 23:38:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.244] (HELO na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 23:38:33 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob118.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUZLK0c262jlQ5Ic2WaxjaMgvOHgLGphJ@postini.com; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:38:13 PDT Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id un3so1277279obb.33 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nuJEuGYODIn/dTRB5TXhfOFEPWOslUsjcLayQfj8YJ0=; b=S27tYX+ODUEAojpn8/FBNtjrs2TV6zOwlmsuDQggjWKtj7OTxtWQgwVTrUlChAUvig 9uOy7iQFsJc9zRlV9tOX1VCuo2898q8mf2p8h/89JLMJLSVasD2yAPy9Eqvfqyn0EEJl ANDI0LzOLx5Y3/8k5eCxsHkKW03DcjHvg06UGKm3KzjtJDBmJkrVr7U1LMxPzRWASpYn ZYWBk4lF3GYSt5KC/vYEOOb3ABbTfPXLnIpZRobYKzT00KYgfggOL+oLQwzypreEDn/m 2pN81o9LlpsVy5HPOiZn67M4bnDFD+08pMoNA8HyUgEAIOjYKYjQHb2ZEWpQhRK4D+rm 11wQ== X-Received: by 10.182.44.227 with SMTP id h3mr15721978obm.16.1368574671438; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.44.227 with SMTP id h3mr15721974obm.16.1368574671335; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.156.43 with HTTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <008A60A0-82BE-48BE-BAAE-F245570B49B4@basho.com> References: <20130514205655.GU24552@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <8B75117D-AA85-45B9-8F52-CCE601BFEF7B@basho.com> <008A60A0-82BE-48BE-BAAE-F245570B49B4@basho.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:37:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ACS41] Next release candidate coming in a few hours! From: Chip Childers To: John Burwell Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2f40222424b04dcb61fee X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkbA8JXG77UbeXQf2a1YRHwZaXWnju/q5cJ5pNC4zFRNKq1UltCx0PxzLL6yK7nIJHzGgZvEIZ07Uh1THZGTODDoOsTUcQ6EKqyrIYBZmyXYX/9aW8itFBfhs+RI13sDWmgB7JpCg26m+ZRcj4LzX7Fy91wdGVSa5PtSIdJwRiGp7kMiA= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2f40222424b04dcb61fee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, John Burwell wrote: > Chip, > > After some further discussion about this issue on IRC, Alex and I > determined that system VM clock drift issue not only breaks S3, but has > other significant impacts that merit it being a blocker for 4.1 (e.g. > timestamps of files written by the SSVM being incorrect, log file > correlation difficulties, sensitivity of other storage protocols to time > sync, etc). Based on this conversation, I have opened CLOUDSTACK-2492 to > capture the issue and track resolution. > > Thanks, > -John > Well shoot. Issuing a new system VM is going to require a bunch of testing if it's not done as a hand rolled edit of the existing system VMs. Who can take this? > > On May 14, 2013, at 6:09 PM, John Burwell > > wrote: > > Chip, > > The source of the problem appears to be clock drift between the SSVM and > S3 per following stack trace: > > 2013-05-14 06:51:55,400 DEBUG [cloud.utils.S3Utils] > (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Putting directory > /mnt/SecStorage/93fd0cb0-033b-3248-bcd0-ef6d460635ef/template/tmpl/1/5 in > S3 bucket jsb-cloudstack-templates. > 2013-05-14 06:51:55,401 DEBUG [cloud.utils.S3Utils] > (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Creating S3 client with configuration: [protocol: > https, connectionTimeOut: 50000, maxErrorRetry: 3, socketTimeout: 50000] > 2013-05-14 06:51:55,403 DEBUG > [storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > Determining key using account id 1 and template id 5 > 2013-05-14 06:51:55,403 DEBUG [cloud.utils.S3Utils] > (agentRequest-Handler-3:) Putting file > /mnt/SecStorage/93fd0cb0-033b-3248-bcd0-ef6d460635ef/template/tmpl/1/5/template.properties > into bucket jsb-cloudstack-templates with key > template/tmpl/1/5/template.properties. > 2013-05-14 06:51:55,578 ERROR > [storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > Failed to upload template id 5 > Status Code: 403, AWS Service: Amazon S3, AWS Request ID: > 970A274E132A9ACB, AWS Error Code: RequestTimeTooSkewed, AWS Error Message: > The difference between the request time and the current time is too large., > S3 Extended Request ID: > 9w8a6YBxTn+WlBg96s9stxWuuP8oQ7ksZtg6++wVRHJfE2qmucrilhoEJVetJui4 > at > com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:609) > at > com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:309) > at > com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:164) > at > com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:2863) > at > com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.putObject(AmazonS3Client.java:1100) > at > com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.putObject(AmazonS3Client.java:963) > at com.cloud.utils.S3Utils.putDirectory(S3Utils.java:282) > at > com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.execute(NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:414) > at > com.cloud.storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource.executeRequest(NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:212) > at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525) > at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:852) > at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:83) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) > > It does not appear that the System VM image has NTP nor does it seem like > a valid assumption that an SSVM would have the connectivity to reach an NTP > server. Therefore, do we have some other means to sync the clock on the > SSVM (e.g. with the host through hypervisor extensions)? In my previous > tests, the SSVM seemed to be syncing its time to the host which addressed > the problem. > > Thanks, > -John > > On May 14, 2013, at 4:58 PM, John Burwell > > wrote: > > Chip, > > I am looking into the issue now. There is a failure when the S3 upload > template command is issued. I working to determine whether or not the > cause is environmental or code. > > Thanks, > -John > > On May 14, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Chip Childers > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We have a clear bug list (blockers and critical) for 4.1.0. I'm going > to cut a new release candidate tonight. > > If there are *any* outstanding issues known, now's the time to raise > them. > > (I'm specifically looking for an ACK from jburwell here, since he > mentioned a possible S3 feature issue. John, if you can please give me > a heads up on where you stand in the next few hours, I'd appreciate it.) > > -chip > > > > > --001a11c2f40222424b04dcb61fee--