Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99EB599E5 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 09:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28376 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2013 09:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 28210 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2013 09:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 28177 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2013 09:31:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 09:31:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajesh.battala@citrix.com designates 203.166.19.134 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.166.19.134] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM.AU) (203.166.19.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 09:31:20 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,713,1363132800"; d="scan'208,223";a="2704539" Received: from sinpex01cl02.citrite.net ([10.151.46.33]) by SYDPIPO01.CITRIX.COM.AU with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 May 2013 09:30:57 +0000 Received: from SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net ([169.254.1.68]) by SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net ([169.254.2.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:30:55 +0800 From: Rajesh Battala To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: RE: Unable to start System VM's in KVM Failing with error Domain is Tainted with high-privilages Thread-Topic: Unable to start System VM's in KVM Failing with error Domain is Tainted with high-privilages Thread-Index: Ac5V+8nPq9fCbr4QSY+bjhMhB1+YDP//f98A//93LvCAAJWwgP//eQOw Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:30:54 +0000 Message-ID: <8CCE9859D2CAFD45948DBF7145AFB98C0B968C@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net> References: <8CCE9859D2CAFD45948DBF7145AFB98C0B949C@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net> <20130521084000.GA6542@banmlcharlesf01.citrite.net> <8CCE9859D2CAFD45948DBF7145AFB98C0B9531@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net> <20130521092603.GA12074@banmlcharlesf01.citrite.net> In-Reply-To: <20130521092603.GA12074@banmlcharlesf01.citrite.net> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.144.7.13] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >From the log,=20 libvirt version: 0.9.10 and it's is from package: 21.el6 x86-003.build.bo= s.redhat.com) Thanks Rajesh Battala > -----Original Message----- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Unable to start System VM's in KVM Failing with error Domain= is > Tainted with high-privilages >=20 > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:55:23AM +0000, Rajesh Battala wrote: > > This issue I saw while looking at the logs for the issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2330 [[Automation] > Failed to deploy VR in KVM]. > > > > Build/Code is from the latest master branch. Latest system templates ar= e > used. > All the domains are failing on these hosts. So it seems like an environme= nt > problem because my KVM hosts are able to spin up VMs fine on master. >=20 > 2013-05-04 07:12:02.584+0000: 26210: warning : qemuDomainObjTaint:1297 : > Domain id=3D7 name=3D'v-2-VM' uuid=3D1422832d-be18-352a-a08a-9bbff40e0d14 > is tainted: high-privileges > 2013-05-04 07:13:36.851+0000: 26206: error : qemuMonitorIO:574 : internal > error End of file from monitor >=20 > ^ The real error is the monitor EOF. >=20 > More googling reveals this is a possible race condition in libvirt: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg00051.html >=20 > But I'm not sure if that's what's happening here. Someone with more > libvirt/qemu expertise will have to look at this. :( >=20 > Can the bug report be updated with the version of libvirt? The line numbe= rs > don't match up for the qemuMonitorIO method in the error log. >=20 > I'd follow up on the #virt channel too to see if there's anyone who knows= . >=20 > ------------------------ > Powered by BigRock.com