Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:25:57 -0400
From: Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
Message-ID: <20130522202557.GU56667@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
References: <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD87021BD5@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
 <CAKprHVbM0ePzv-HsC3WdR_CAz9GYW1ZKjvGrX9_OS=-FjC6AdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130520175238.GQ56667@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
 <195439EE-15D8-447C-ADFA-A548CEE9E24F@basho.com>
 <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD87023426@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
 <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD870235F1@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
 <C637DD8A-9929-474E-94C9-EEA043649AD8@basho.com>
 <C3637609BC1C0D40A2AC70F4760C7A2D0272F7@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
 <20130522190735.GI56667@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
 <C3637609BC1C0D40A2AC70F4760C7A2D02807C@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C3637609BC1C0D40A2AC70F4760C7A2D02807C@SJCPEX01CL02.citrite.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
> > 
> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburwell@basho.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
> > > >
> > > > Edison,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, I will start going through it today.  Based on other $dayjob
> > > > responsibilities, it may take me a couple of days.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -John
> > > [Animesh>] John we are just a few days away  from 4.2 feature freeze, can
> > you provide your comments by Friday 5/24.   I would like all feature threads
> > to be resolved sooner so that we don't have last minute rush.
> > 
> > I'm just going to comment on this, but not take it much further...  this type of
> > change is an "architectural" change.  We had previously discussed (on several
> > threads) that the appropriate time for this sort of thing to hit master was
> > *early* in the release cycle.  Any reason that that consensus doesn't apply
> > here?
> [Animesh>] Yes it is an architectural change and discussion on this started a few weeks back already, Min and Edison wanted to get it in sooner by  4/30 but it took longer than anticipated in  preparing for merge and testing on feature branch. 
> 
> 

You're not following me I think.  See this thread on the Javelin merge:

http://markmail.org/message/e6peml5ddkqa6jp4

We have discussed that our preference is for architectural changes to
hit master shortly after a feature branch is cut.  Why are we not doing
that here?