cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 18:47:10 GMT
I'm also reneging on my 0 vote, and move it to a +1 to release.


On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Mathias Mullins <
mathias.mullins@citrix.com> wrote:

> Reading through this and seeing Chiradeep's passionate comments here and
> reasoning. I'Ll go from -1 to +1 on this. Especially since we will see
> this in 4.2.
>
> I still think it's a bruise, but hopefully will not be a black eye.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 5/22/13 10:24 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> ><Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> For those wanting to use the S3-sync for XCP/Xen, they could use the 4.2
> >> template. Just like the IPV6 feature, that could be deemed experimental.
> >
> >I'm now in agreement with this.  The "root issue" is now solved for
> >KVM and VMware users in 4.1.  We have also resolved the root cause in
> >the new system VM templates.  We can provide instructions for using
> >the new system VM templates within the documentation prior to
> >releasing 4.1, and highlight that required step if using S3.
> >
> >I'm +1 on moving forward (although I started the vote, I figured I
> >should also cast a vote on this one).
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message