cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template
Date Thu, 09 May 2013 23:16:45 GMT
Don't know. We can use Ubuntu package for now if it possible.

or just use sid packages if possible?

dnsmasq version is 0.62, which is good enough for ipv6.

--Sheng


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:

> How old? When did it disappear?
>
> I propose using the Ubuntu  package.
> In tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh
>
> wget
> http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/h/haproxy/haproxy_1.4.18-0ubunt
> u2.1_i386.deb
>
> dpkg -i haproxy_1.4.18-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb
>
> Also do we know if the system vm template contains the version of dnsmasq
> that is known to work for ipv6 support?
>
> --
> Chiradeep
>
> On 5/9/13 3:48 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>
> >No idea. Probably we should just grab some old generated systemvm for now.
> >
> >--Sheng
> >
> >
> >On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Should we use the Ubuntu package for now?
> >>
> >> On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is
> >>missing.
> >> >
> >> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447
> >> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html
> >> >
> >> >The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule
> >>of
> >> >recovering yet.
> >> >
> >> >That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is
> >>dangerous.
> >> >
> >> >--Sheng
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhaisaab@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <
> >> >> agneya2001@hotmail.com
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare
> >>system
> >> >>VM
> >> >> > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for
> >> >> different
> >> >> > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the services
> >> >> > installed on all the system VM templates meant for different
> >> >>hypervisors
> >> >> > should be same ?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh, if it's
> >> >>there
> >> >> those pkgs will be installed.
> >> >> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my system
> >>and
> >> >> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -abhi
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message