cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP
Date Wed, 29 May 2013 19:40:51 GMT
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:02:59AM +0000, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 28/05/13 11:42 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >
> >+1 to this proposal (with one concern noted below).
> >
> >> 
> >> Effort I am proposing is to get API semantics right with minimal
> >>changes.
> >> I am not proposing to enable portability for zone level public Ip's for
> >> 4.2 but can be done for later release. Please comment.
> >
> >Does it make sense to actually get the API for 4.2 to match this
> >proposal?  Once we release it, changing the meaning really means
> >breaking the contract, right?
> 
> I was not clear in my mail. Yes, my intention is to get the API right for
> 4.2 so that it can be extended cleanly in later releases.

ACK - thanks for clarifying.  LGTM

Mime
View raw message