cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 20:25:57 GMT
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
> > 
> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburwell@basho.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
> > > >
> > > > Edison,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, I will start going through it today.  Based on other $dayjob
> > > > responsibilities, it may take me a couple of days.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -John
> > > [Animesh>] John we are just a few days away  from 4.2 feature freeze, can
> > you provide your comments by Friday 5/24.   I would like all feature threads
> > to be resolved sooner so that we don't have last minute rush.
> > 
> > I'm just going to comment on this, but not take it much further...  this type of
> > change is an "architectural" change.  We had previously discussed (on several
> > threads) that the appropriate time for this sort of thing to hit master was
> > *early* in the release cycle.  Any reason that that consensus doesn't apply
> > here?
> [Animesh>] Yes it is an architectural change and discussion on this started a few
weeks back already, Min and Edison wanted to get it in sooner by  4/30 but it took longer
than anticipated in  preparing for merge and testing on feature branch. 
> 
> 

You're not following me I think.  See this thread on the Javelin merge:

http://markmail.org/message/e6peml5ddkqa6jp4

We have discussed that our preference is for architectural changes to
hit master shortly after a feature branch is cut.  Why are we not doing
that here?

Mime
View raw message