cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 19:30:02 GMT
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0000, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> On 5/22/13 11:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be
> >>supported in AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account
> >>specific guest network. Alena will look at their database to help them
> >>migrate the db
> >
> >Well done, and thank you for doing a real-time support session!
> >
> >Alena, do you expect that we will have an "official" database migration
> >script that needs to be in the release?  Or is this just something that
> >you believe to be very unique to that user?
> >
> 
> 
> Chip,
> 
> The purpose of this migration script is to transform Advance SG enabled
> zone to Advance SG disabled zone while being on 2.2.x. It should be used
> only by the customers who created this kind of zone and added VmWare
> hypervisor to it - something that CS didn't support even back in 2.2.x (no
> support for SG groups on vmWare, in both Basic and Advance zone).
> 
> I don't think the script should become a part of the release as officially
> we don't support SG enabled to SG disabled zone conversion.

Understood.  However, can we post it somewhere so that it can be
referenced if someone has this issue in the future?

> 
> 
> Customers who configured Advance SG enabled zone with Xen/KVM hypervisors,
> will expect their configuration to work as it used to, after upgrading to
> 4.1. Nothing should be changed in their DB, SG functionality should be
> preserved as well. For that, Anthony's code merge for Advance SG enabled
> zone should become a part of 4.1. Otherwise we should announce that this
> functionality is not supported in 4.1, and 2.2.x customers having this
> type of zone, shouldn't upgrade to 4.1 CS.
> 

I'm not advocating pulling in the SG for Advanced Zones feature anymore.
I *do* realize that we will still have some stranded users sitting on
2.x versions (which stinks), but the decision to drop support was
pre-ASF and the re-inclusion of the feature should follow the normal
process (bring it in via a standard new feature merge window).

Based on the notes above - I'm going to *not* block on CLOUDSTACK-2463
anymore.

-chip

> 
> -Alena.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message