Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F196DF411 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66599 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2013 18:15:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 66555 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2013 18:15:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 66547 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2013 18:15:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:15:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rohityadav89@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.51] (HELO mail-ee0-f51.google.com) (74.125.83.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:15:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c4so2986204eek.38 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=P2Qn7T+UmlPCzc6mJJ2C9SF6N/N+0/vVvV+bcv5hf6g=; b=lZUbLXPzceTXa4eYpvdFHYyspgwMCwjZYKIJnHBTh/uHfqZFqAKq6EewE5MWaAo9P7 NJ9GKdCguKX5DGQa/NbJfLOEycDqrYp08mxPZvVuwYjvDN5pkpkp8iW3KCTcAopDI7L8 3PjqZ8mbzh+qRbDhoRqAGJbw8QotKdqwd2qmSCfdLdlZn39S34XX4+GPovciblJiNk8r u6q5lVThBHwnOxtvSFKaKYQMqjN09MIWjZaK4U/utksowXbdKl2K5PfnGf8l0E3PqHsf EDgWKxth9oGKMThOqTJqfkKGGMN1w+dUpn0m+nGNUdThEpf6wAtYQzoApCO2kwo3aIKk Bimw== X-Received: by 10.15.35.193 with SMTP id g41mr17334425eev.45.1365531297325; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rohityadav89@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.159.198 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130409062628.GD1689@cloud-2.local> References: <062C66BA-11E3-4FB0-9336-9A0C71CCC47D@gmail.com> <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D4013D7DB07B4C@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E0141EAB92640@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E0141EAB93038@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <20130409062628.GD1689@cloud-2.local> From: Rohit Yadav Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 23:44:37 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rLTYGZ8KKzSwrgbCspZ_0YTDFd0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e016813c2e8dd3e04d9f187c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e016813c2e8dd3e04d9f187c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] Folks I wanted to get your opinion on auto-assignment > > based on the component maintainers list. We can also create shared > > issues filters based on components. Folks can subscribe to the > > filters of interest and receive daily email notification. > > I have no opinion and am okay whichever way - auto-assign/unassigned. > But these workflows should be _*clearly*_ mentioned to contributors > and where they will go looking for them - wiki, website etc. > > A non-sponsored new/old (casual/hippie) contributor would try to search among unassigned issues, while managers/developers/committers whose $dayjob allows them to work on ACS fulltime will tend to do 'cookie lickin' which is understandable and will assure that someone gets the privilege to work on it and their employers will make sure the task would be done :) I would prefer an environment where every contributor (sponsored or otherwise) would assign the tickets themselves, and unassign if they cannot do it or don't have time/resources for it. We've already seen several occasions where someone assigns an issue to someone and we see cycle of assignments because the "assigner" had no clue about the issue or did not really know who would could really resolve the issue. Just saying. Cheers. Triaging and assigning issues at the time of release to > contributors/committers by the Release Manager shouldn't be a problem > at all as long as it's communicated (as Chip did for the RC bugs) > > Thanks, > > -- > Prasanna., > --089e016813c2e8dd3e04d9f187c7--