Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7888F8C0 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26975 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 17:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 26927 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2013 17:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 26919 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2013 17:41:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.89] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:41:43 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,528,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="20834477" Received: from sjcpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 22 Apr 2013 17:41:22 +0000 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.72]) by SJCPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:41:22 -0700 From: Sudha Ponnaganti To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:41:03 -0700 Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 Thread-Topic: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 Thread-Index: Ac48acUaBfbl8UeeSyeYOe2Ijl92jwABsIEwACY78UAAAxf8oACJ6lyQABCkQUA= Message-ID: <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F10143BB543CB0@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <1A7163247D498044A96630B712400E1008140334@SBPOMB101.sbp.lan> <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F10143611FFE50@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <1A7163247D498044A96630B712400E10081416B0@SBPOMB101.sbp.lan> <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F10143611FFFC1@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <1A7163247D498044A96630B712400E10081442DA@SBPOMB101.sbp.lan> In-Reply-To: <1A7163247D498044A96630B712400E10081442DA@SBPOMB101.sbp.lan> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No worries. I have closed the defect and one of the stories (725) as well. But waiting for doc to be completed to lose this [1] story [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-726 -----Original Message----- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]=20 Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 I updated the page you pasted for me to conclude the bureaucratic part. Hop= e it satisfied the apache/cloudstack way. Is it there a formal timeline bet= ween resolved and closed status for tickets to observe? (otherwise 2092 ca= n be closed) -----Original Message----- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]=20 Sent: vrijdag 19 april 2013 17:54 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 If you do additional tests or update any results, you can edit that page an= d update it. Otherwise I just copied your email, If you don't mind, can you add a note to the ticket on the testing done and= close them. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]=20 Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 7:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 Hy Sudha Both tickets can be closed. I am not sure what to do with the page you created for me. Do you want me t= o copy the table below, with the fail changed to pass, in a new child page = there? Regards, Daan Hoogland -----Original Message----- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]=20 Sent: donderdag 18 april 2013 22:17 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 Thanks Daan for posting test results ! I have created a place holder for you to update test results [1] - You can = update it at your convenience.=20 Does this execution cover both of these stories for Nicira [2], [3]. If it = covers both of these stories, may be these can be closed. Looks like doc is= also outstanding as per the JIRA status.=20 [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+T= est+Execution [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-726 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-727 Thanks /Sudha -----Original Message----- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:38 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 LS, At Schuberg Philis we did some tests on the 4.1 code for the tests in the f= ollowing table Test Case ID Test Description Results Infrastructure NVP-001 Create NVP Element pass NVP-002 Disable NVP Element pass NVP-003 Enable NVP Element pass NVP-004 Delete NVP Element pass NVP-005 Create NVP Device pass NVP-006 Delete NVP Device pass L2 Functions NVP-101 Create Logical Switch pass NVP-102 Create Logical Port pass NVP-103 Check Connection Pass NVP-104 Check Connection Pass NVP-105 Delete Logical Switch Pass NVP-106 Delete Logical Port Pass L3 Functions NVP-201 Create Logical Router Pass NVP-202 Create Source Nat rule Pass NVP-203 Create Static Nat rule Pass NVP-204 Create Port FW rule Pass NVP-205 Check Source Nat rule Pass NVP-206 Check Static Nat rule Pass NVP-207 Check Port FW rule Pass NVP-208 Delete Source Nat rule Pass NVP-209 Delete Static Nat rule Fail NVP-210 Delete Port FW rule Pass NVP-211 Delete Logical Router Pass The tests where partly done aith scripts but these are not yet complete and= the remainder of functionality was done by hand. For the failed test, NVP-209 a ticket was created, 'CLOUDSTACK-2092'. The p= roblem in this case was that deleting the static rule did not result in the= deletion of the ip adres from the logical router. Kind regards, Daan Hoogland