Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:08:25 -0400
From: Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
To: Alena Prokharchyk <Alena.Prokharchyk@citrix.com>
Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>,
	David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>, Rohit Yadav <bhaisaab@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?
Message-ID: <20130418180825.GG88962@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
References: <20130418180214.GF88962@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
 <CD9583B7.28491%alena.prokharchyk@citrix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CD9583B7.28491%alena.prokharchyk@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> On 4/18/13 11:02 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> >> I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for
> >> >>4.0
> >> >> 
> >> >> Chip, what do you think?
> >> >
> >> >Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already?
> >> >
> >> >I think Joe is asking about the 4.0 branch, since he's about to cut the
> >> >second RC for that code line.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 4.1 does have correct code. Chip, would you advise to patch 4.0? It
> >>would
> >> require java code changes - fixing annotations in the APIs. Then we have
> >> to generate new xml/html api docs.
> >> 
> >> -Alena.
> >
> >Joe's the RM for the 4.0.2 release.  I think he's asking about (1)
> >impact, (2) risk and (3) how quick the fix will be.  We're about to
> >start another round of voting for 4.0.2, and generating new API docs
> >will be part of that release process anyway.  The question is really
> >intended to get the code clean so that the (hopefully) last 4.0.x
> >release has correct docs in it.
> >
> 
> 
> There is a minimal impact - only api docs will get affected, and the fix
> should be relatively quick as all we have to do is to fix @Implementation
> parameter in 3 java classes.
> 
>

I *think* joe would love a patch for the 4.0 branch for this!