cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [MERGE] ASA 1000v as external firewall in isolated guest networks
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:50:36 GMT

On 4/12/13 6:55 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:

>On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:55:56PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:20:39AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:39:29AM +0000, Koushik Das wrote:
>> > > Currently there are no functional tests, did e2e tests manually.
>> > > There are some external setup that is required which then needs to
>>be added to Cloudstack like Nexus 1000v, VNMC, ASA 1000v appliance
>>details. I don't see any existing tests related to Vmware/Nexus stuff
>>which I can reuse, so implementing all these steps would need some time.
>> > > 
>> > > So wanted to check if it is ok to merge now and add the functional
>>tests subsequently?
>> > 
>> > Before we merge it in, can we first discuss how we want to hand this
>> > sort of thing?  It seems that at least a marvin test, not run by
>> > default, would be helpful here.  Certainly documentation on how to
>>setup
>> > an environment to support the test is also needed.
>> > 
>> > Do other's have thoughts on this?
>> 
>> +1 - I can spare some hardware to host virtual instances of the ASA
>> appliance. We do NetScaler VPXs in this fashion. But I'm not sure what
>> kind of pre-programming will be required on the ASA to run the test.
>> So some documentation would certainly help.
>
>Koushik,
>
>I think that it will require working with Prasanna to get a Marvin test
>suite for the feature ready to go.  I'd personally like to see that
>*prior* to the merge into master.  We need to "up our game" on automated
>testing of new features, so that we stop digging ourselves deeper and
>deeper into a hole.
>
>-chip

But this approach isn't scalable either.

Every new whiz bang network device will require infrastructure / licenses
/ etc. 


I think if there's component level tests of the code introduced (at least
the network elements) that should be a good first step.

--
Chiradeep


Mime
View raw message