cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeronimo Garcia <garciaj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: System VMs Failover
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:28:41 GMT
Thanks.

Is primary storage zone wide too?



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:

> Secondary storage is zone wide not pod-specific.
> Pod2 probably has some problems (enough shared storage perhaps?). The MS
> logs should indicate the problem.
>
> On 4/11/13 7:03 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >just to clarify I'm using KVM.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jeronimo Garcia
> ><garciaj.uk@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your answer .
> >> System vms images are normally in secondary storage ,  and currently i
> >> have 3 pods and one and only secondary storage nfs system,
> >>
> >> When i shut down all the servers on POD1 ,  the system vms refused to
> >> launch in pod2 ,  would it be cause Pod2 has to have it's own secondary
> >> storage.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Kelven Yang
> >><kelven.yang@citrix.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> System VMs are tend to be running in stateless mode, instead of
> >>>fail-over
> >>> of same VM, we are launching new instance of them, this behave is done
> >>>for
> >>> storage and console proxy system VM, for virtual router system VM,
> >>>there
> >>> is a redundant configuration, automatic HA would make the redundant
> >>> configuration unstable. so in general, system VMs don't use HA offering
> >>> purposely.
> >>>
> >>> Kelven
> >>>
> >>> On 4/11/13 7:54 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Anyone ever bumped into this yet?
> >>> >
> >>> >Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeronimo Garcia
> >>> ><garciaj.uk@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Hi List.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now ,  system
> >>>vms
> >>> >>can
> >>> >> only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore
pod.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I'm guessing this is because the system vm is using a management
ip
> >>> >> assigned to that specific pod.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Is there any HA offering that could make system VMs to failover
to
> >>> >> different pods/clusters?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks!
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message