cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sudha Ponnaganti <sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1
Date Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:41:03 GMT
No worries. I have closed the defect and one of the stories (725)  as well.
But waiting for doc to be completed to lose this [1] story

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-726


-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

I updated the page you pasted for me to conclude the bureaucratic part. Hope it satisfied
the apache/cloudstack way. Is it there a formal timeline between resolved and closed status
for tickets to observe?  (otherwise 2092 can be closed)

-----Original Message-----
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com] 
Sent: vrijdag 19 april 2013 17:54
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

If you do additional tests or update any results, you can edit that page and update it. Otherwise
I just copied your email,

If you don't mind, can you add a note to the ticket on the testing done and close them. Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 7:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

Hy Sudha

Both tickets can be closed.

I am not sure what to do with the page you created for me. Do you want me to copy the table
below, with the fail changed to pass, in a new child page there?

Regards,
Daan Hoogland

-----Original Message-----
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com] 
Sent: donderdag 18 april 2013 22:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

Thanks Daan for posting test results !

I have created a place holder for you to update test results [1] - You can update it at your
convenience. 
Does this execution cover both of these stories for Nicira [2], [3]. If it covers both of
these stories, may be these can be closed. Looks like doc is also outstanding as per the JIRA
status. 

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Test+Execution
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-726
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-727



Thanks
/Sudha

-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

LS,

At Schuberg Philis we did some tests on the 4.1 code for the tests in the following table
Test Case ID  Test Description         Results
           Infrastructure
NVP-001         Create NVP Element pass
NVP-002         Disable NVP Element            pass
NVP-003         Enable NVP Element pass
NVP-004         Delete NVP Element  pass
NVP-005         Create NVP Device   pass
NVP-006         Delete NVP Device    pass
           L2 Functions
NVP-101         Create Logical Switch            pass
NVP-102         Create Logical Port    pass
NVP-103         Check Connection     Pass
NVP-104         Check Connection     Pass
NVP-105         Delete Logical Switch            Pass
NVP-106         Delete Logical Port     Pass
           L3 Functions
NVP-201         Create Logical Router            Pass
NVP-202         Create Source Nat rule          Pass
NVP-203         Create Static Nat rule            Pass
NVP-204         Create Port FW rule   Pass
NVP-205         Check Source Nat rule          Pass
NVP-206         Check Static Nat rule Pass
NVP-207         Check Port FW rule   Pass
NVP-208         Delete Source Nat rule          Pass
NVP-209         Delete Static Nat rule Fail
NVP-210         Delete Port FW rule   Pass
NVP-211         Delete Logical Router            Pass

The tests where partly done aith scripts but these are not yet complete and the remainder
of functionality was done by hand.
For the failed test, NVP-209 a ticket was created, 'CLOUDSTACK-2092'. The problem in this
case was that deleting the static rule did not result in the deletion of the ip adres from
the logical router.

Kind regards,
Daan Hoogland

Mime
View raw message