cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Third Round)
Date Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:44:41 GMT


Build process completed with NONOSS patches. 
Rolled RPMS for 6.3. 
Installed and tested basic functionality successfully. 

+1 
----- Original Message -----

From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@zonker.net> 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 10:50:11 AM 
Subject: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Third Round) 

Hi all, 

I've created a 4.0.2 release, and am asking for you to test the 
artifacts and *after* testing, please submit a vote. 

Suggested testing procedure here: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure 

(Please don't just +1 a release without any testing!) 

The following artifacts up for a vote: 

Git Branch and Commit SH: 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0 
Commit: 48e7eadb85bd033b642cbc83b0698d4175a183fb 

List of changes: 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.0 

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same 
location): 
http://people.apache.org/~jzb/cloudstack/dist/releases/4.0.2/ 

PGP release keys (signed using A0207CD4): 
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS 

Vote will be open for 72 hours. 

NOTE: The only changes between this and the last voting round are to the 
version numbers in the three pom.xml files that aren't automatically 
changed to 4.0.2. The nonoss build breaks if the versions aren't 
correct, so that is fixed now. 

If you are trying to build nonoss RPMs, the default cloud.spec won't 
work. So if you want to build nonoss RPMs for 4.0.2, grab this spec file 
and cp it to cloud.spec under your cloudstack source directory: 

http://people.apache.org/~jzb/cloudstack/dist/releases/4.0.2/nonoss.cloud.spec 

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote? 

[ ] +1 approve 
[ ] +0 no opinion 
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) 

Best, 

jzb 
-- 
Joe Brockmeier 
jzb@zonker.net 
Twitter: @jzb 
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ 








Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message