cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ram Ganesh <Ram.Gan...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
Date Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:16:09 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rohityadav89@gmail.com [mailto:rohityadav89@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 01 April 2013 13:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
> 
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
> sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following
> > upgrade defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little
> > closer to 4.1 RC.
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-1839          Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more
> > keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.
> >
> 
> Check what happened to create-index-fk.sql, why was it removed and fix
> upgrade path from 40 to 410.
> 
> 
> > CLOUDSTACK-1856          Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3
> > parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up.
> >
> 
> Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file, this
> is a packaging issue.

I see following commit removing these parameters - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-commits/201212.mbox/%3C20121219220428.9E565324537@tyr.zones.apache.org%3E.
Are they obsolete now?

> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > /Sudha
> >

Mime
View raw message