cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nitin Mehta" <nitin.me...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2087: Destroying the instance is not decrementing the primary storage usage [Resource Count table - No of volumes is not got decremented]
Date Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:48:07 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#review19579
-----------------------------------------------------------



server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#comment40435>

    Would restore vm increment these limits again ?
    



server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#comment40436>

    What about the resource limit for the vm ? where is that getting decremented. Are these
consistent ?


- Nitin Mehta


On April 23, 2013, 8:42 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 23, 2013, 8:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, and Min Chen.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-2087: Destroying the instance is not decrementing the primary storage usage
[Resource Count table - No of volumes is not got decremented] 
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2087.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java c1f3f15 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tests:
> 1. Deploy an instance from a user account.
> 2. Check the updated resource count (primary storage and volume).
> 3. Destroy the same instance.
> 4. Verify the decremented resource count from the account detailView.  
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjay Tripathi
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message