cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?
Date Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:08:25 GMT
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> On 4/18/13 11:02 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> >> I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for
> >> >>4.0
> >> >> 
> >> >> Chip, what do you think?
> >> >
> >> >Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already?
> >> >
> >> >I think Joe is asking about the 4.0 branch, since he's about to cut the
> >> >second RC for that code line.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 4.1 does have correct code. Chip, would you advise to patch 4.0? It
> >>would
> >> require java code changes - fixing annotations in the APIs. Then we have
> >> to generate new xml/html api docs.
> >> 
> >> -Alena.
> >
> >Joe's the RM for the 4.0.2 release.  I think he's asking about (1)
> >impact, (2) risk and (3) how quick the fix will be.  We're about to
> >start another round of voting for 4.0.2, and generating new API docs
> >will be part of that release process anyway.  The question is really
> >intended to get the code clean so that the (hopefully) last 4.0.x
> >release has correct docs in it.
> >
> 
> 
> There is a minimal impact - only api docs will get affected, and the fix
> should be relatively quick as all we have to do is to fix @Implementation
> parameter in 3 java classes.
> 
>

I *think* joe would love a patch for the 4.0 branch for this!

Mime
View raw message