cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Brockmeier <...@zonker.net>
Subject Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes
Date Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:05:48 GMT
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ?

Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation
development? It's not like we can dock their volunteer pay. ;-) 

In all seriousness - I'm sure that it's frustrating to do the work and
wait on feedback that is slow in coming. But every project suffers from
more work than hands to do it. I don't think we should be looking to
penalize or shame anybody, we just need to find ways to help people do
their work more efficiently.

We *could* revert features where the developer has not reviewed
documentation, but who does that help? Assuming a feature is complete
and isn't buggy, is it better for the user not to have a feature because
someone didn't have enough time to review docs? Probably not. 

In this case, I think Chip's proposal is the right one: docs folks
should do the docs to the best of their ability, commit, and raise the
new docs to the attention of the developer(s) specifically responsible
for the feature and the dev@ list in general. (And perhaps even the
user@ list.) 

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
jzb@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Mime
View raw message