cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] QuickCloud
Date Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:37:31 GMT
For clouds offering a full range of network services ("Advanced"), the
virtual router template will still be necessary.

On 3/25/13 2:43 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <bhaisaab@apache.org> wrote:

>Nice proposal, I would love to escape the necessity to preseed and
>launch service VMs in order to install/start CloudStack to launch
>instances.
>
>But, in future when this work will be completed, won't we have to
>preseed systemvm templates or this whole service vms feature (vr,
>ssvm, cpvm) would be optional?
>
>Regards.
>
>On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
><Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be
>>made optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
>> I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposal is
>>here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ
>>


Mime
View raw message