cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ahmad Emneina <>
Subject Re: basic zone security groups
Date Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:45:43 GMT
If ebtables -F restores vm service(s)... it sounds like a bug.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen <>wrote:

> Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and
> I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The
> result was that all of the instances deployed could not host services.
> They could get out, but nothing could reach their IPs. I ran an
> 'ebtables -t nat -L' and saw that there were rules set up for each
> instance, but there were no security group settings available to
> adjust. Is this a bug, or was I doing something wrong?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message