cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins
Date Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:42:04 GMT
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Alex Huang <> wrote:
> Hi All,
> As most of you are aware, the master branch keeps getting broken by checkins for various
reasons.  Committers need to be more responsible about their checkins but I don't think we
can depend on that happening.  There are various reasons.  The most obvious to me is that
granting committership is not based on code competency.  (And I don't think it should.)  Given
that we need to build a BVT system for ensure that checkins do not break the branch.

I like the idea of this alot. It's not quite continuous integration,
but its closer than where we are now.
A couple of additional comments. This really isn't about code
competency. There are really three problems. The first is that people
are fallible, make mistakes, regardless of their competency. The
second is that CloudStack is a rather large codebase, with a ton of
different codepaths, many that are currently very difficult to
exercise from a developers laptop. Third, CloudStack has lots of
moving pieces, many that you may no know about.

I am ok with gating feature merges on running BVT tests or more. I do
not think that this is a replacement for unit tests, it's just
another, more intensive, layer of testing.

Tell me how I can help with this.


View raw message