cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: Using newer DIY SystemVMs
Date Sat, 02 Mar 2013 00:48:48 GMT
Thank Rohit!

I would try this template for ipv6 later...

--Sheng

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemneina@gmail.com> wrote:
> wow, roll your own template sounds awesome. Rohit == awesomesauce
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/1/13 4:03 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <bhaisaab@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >- Saw systemvms started from the template, saw patching happening,
>> >logged in with creds (root/password) to verify that it was indeed the
>> >new one (Linux 3.2 :)
>> >- The agents were running fine, there was a latency issue (agents were
>> >lagging behind)
>> >- (Applied a fix describe on CLOUDSTACK-1370 to make the deployVM
>> >work) VR came up, did it's SDN magic and tinyLinux was deployed
>> >- Console proxy worked for me as well
>>
>> I would also test
>>  - password server
>>  - user data management (is apache web server running?)
>> In addition
>>  - zone-to-zone template copy
>>  - template creation
>>  - convert snapshot to template
>>  - vpc
>>  - ipv6
>>
>> >
>> >Chiradeep, is there a way to convert VHD (HyperV) to VHD (Xen), I hear
>> >that they both differ in some magic bits?
>> Actually since we intend to support Windows 2012, we should be using VHDX.
>> There's a way to do it with Powershell (from vhd(hyper-v) -> vhdx)
>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2012/10/03/using-powershell-
>> to-convert-a-vhd-to-a-vhdx.aspx
>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message