cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:20:46 GMT
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers
<chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
>> >> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members,
>> >>
>> >> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?
>> >
>> > Looks like it isn't decided.  Do you have an opinion?
>> >
>> > Do others?
>> >
>> > Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus?
>>
>> In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread...
>>
>> I think we're OK with API only.
>
> Ahmad is suggesting otherwise, but I'm in agreement with you.  Our next
> feature release is probably the right time to bring it into the UI.
>
> Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it in
> the UI?

Sorry just found I missed the mail.

If we want UI, I am thinking of if we can add some checkboxs or
something highlighted to ensure that user aware that ipv6 template is
needed?

--Sheng
>
>>
>> --Sheng
>> >
>> >>
>> >> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting this
feature.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thank You
>> >> -Radhika
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM
>> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
>> >>
>> >> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system template
X).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers
>> >> > <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> >> > >> Hi,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for
4.1
>> >> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to
avoid
>> >> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> --Sheng
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > So we talked about it being experimental.  Do you think we should
>> >> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only?  I tend to lean
>> >> > > that way
>> >> > myself.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it.
>> >> >
>> >> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential user
>> >> > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template
>> >> > support would be misleading.
>> >> >
>> >> > --Sheng
>> >> >
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message