cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Huang <>
Subject RE: CLOUDSTACK-1747: fresh deploydb bug in 4.1 requires cherry-pick commits from master
Date Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:24:42 GMT
Hi everyone,

We had a discussion on irc.

To implement something intermediary will be around the same effort as finishing the job and
there are various reasons why just running the create-schema.sql and update*.sql is not enough.
 So we should just decide on finishing the job in 4.1 or document the behavior.  

Any input on which way we should take.

The engineer in me says just finish the job.  It's obviously working in dev setup on master
so the risk of this introducing bugs is very low.  If someone knows why it's difficult to
change in cloud-setup-databases script, please speak up.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers []
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:39 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-1747: fresh deploydb bug in 4.1 requires cherry-
> pick commits from master
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:43:30AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> > Chip,
> >
> > 	By reading Rohit's email and wiki, I understood current situation on
> > this issue. Unlike I previously understood, this DB issue not only
> > happens on dev environment, but also happens on QA/production
> environment as well.
> > And this introduces a different behavior in 4.1 from previous 4.1 release.
> > The commits mentioned in this bug will only fix dev environment, but
> > to fix QA/productioin env, we need that pending feature (making
> > cloud-setup-database use DatabaseCreator) to be done. We need
> > community concensus whether we want to fix it in 4.1 or 4.2. Based on
> > timeline, it may be wise to fix it in 4.2 and create a JIRA ticket to
> > track this. If so, I still think that we need to file a doc bug to
> > document this change in 4.1.
> Is there no option for us to set the correct version for 4.1 during an upgrade /
> fresh install, based on the current approach used in the 4.1 branch?

View raw message