cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Radhika Puthiyetath <radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
Date Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:56:46 GMT
Thanks Sheng.

I shall soon submit a patch.

-Radhika

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 11:30 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
>> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members,
>>
>> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?
>
> Looks like it isn't decided.  Do you have an opinion?
>
> Do others?
>
> Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus?

In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread...

I think we're OK with API only.

--Sheng
>
>>
>> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting this feature.
>>
>>
>> Thank You
>> -Radhika
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
>>
>> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system template X).
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers 
>> > <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 
>> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid 
>> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
>> > >>
>> > >> --Sheng
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > So we talked about it being experimental.  Do you think we should 
>> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only?  I tend to lean 
>> > > that way
>> > myself.
>> >
>> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it.
>> >
>> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential 
>> > user to try it. But left UI there without default system vm 
>> > template support would be misleading.
>> >
>> > --Sheng
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message