cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sudha Ponnaganti <sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:46:55 GMT
Wondering if anyone is interested to pick up QA for this story.

-----Original Message-----
From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.singh@citrix.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:45 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology

I have started putting together the FS for this feature. The initial draft is shared here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Intel+TXT+Technology. Do
let me know your comments/thoughts/concerns.

Regards,
Devdeep

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:55 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:32 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
> > <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > This came in as I was following up on  action item from IRC today.
> > > This
> > feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 
> > and processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in 
> > public forms such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow 
> > missed getting filed. Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1.
> > I understand we are few days past cutoff,  I will ensure we are more 
> > diligent
> in future.
> > >
> > > Animesh
> >
> > Just to close the loop on this.  I'm not sure that this is even 
> > progressing enough to make it in by out feature freeze date (if it 
> > is, it's not visible to the rest of the community).  Is the request 
> > to include it in
> 4.1.0 a moot point?
> >
> [Animesh>] Yes Chip we can move it out of 4.1 Devdeep is still 
> wrapping up on some of his other tasks

Mime
View raw message